RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon 540 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated128
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data25.23
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameLexaAD106
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date26 March 2019 (6 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5124608
Core clock speed1100 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million22,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate35.97244.1
Floating-point processing power1.151 TFLOPS15.62 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs32144
Tensor Coresno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth48 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 March 2019 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 115 Watt

540 Mobile has 130% lower power consumption.

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 540 Mobile and RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 540 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 540 Mobile
Radeon 540 Mobile
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 16 votes

Rate Radeon 540 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 11 votes

Rate RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 540 Mobile or RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.