RTX A2000 Mobile vs Quadro P4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P4200 and RTX A2000 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro P4200
2018
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
23.14
+0.7%

P4200 outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking253255
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.6318.42
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGP104GA107
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date21 February 2018 (7 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042560
Core clock speed1227 MHz1215 MHz
Boost clock speed1647 MHz1687 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate237.2135.0
Floating-point processing power7.589 TFLOPS8.637 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs14480
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.18.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P4200 23.14
+0.7%
RTX A2000 Mobile 22.97

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P4200 10419
+8.2%
RTX A2000 Mobile 9627

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75−80
−5.3%
79
+5.3%
1440p40−45
−5%
42
+5%
4K35−40
−8.6%
38
+8.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0.8%
130−140
−0.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−45.1%
74
+45.1%
God of War 50−55
−78%
89
+78%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+1.1%
90−95
−1.1%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0.8%
130−140
−0.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−21.6%
62
+21.6%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−24.7%
96
+24.7%
Fortnite 110−120
+0.9%
110−120
−0.9%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+1.1%
90−95
−1.1%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
God of War 50−55
−88%
94
+88%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+1.1%
90−95
−1.1%
Valorant 160−170
+0.6%
160−170
−0.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+1.1%
90−95
−1.1%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0.8%
130−140
−0.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+2%
50
−2%
Dota 2 120−130
−19.8%
145
+19.8%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−14.3%
88
+14.3%
Fortnite 110−120
+0.9%
110−120
−0.9%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+1.1%
90−95
−1.1%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
God of War 50−55
−24%
62
+24%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
−23.3%
106
+23.3%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+18.2%
44
−18.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+1.1%
90−95
−1.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
−37.1%
96
+37.1%
Valorant 160−170
+0.6%
160−170
−0.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+1.1%
90−95
−1.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+24.4%
41
−24.4%
Dota 2 120−130
−6.6%
129
+6.6%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−7.8%
83
+7.8%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+1.1%
90−95
−1.1%
God of War 50−55
+19%
42
−19%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+1.1%
90−95
−1.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+40%
50
−40%
Valorant 160−170
+0.6%
160−170
−0.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+0.9%
110−120
−0.9%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+1.2%
160−170
−1.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
−19%
50
+19%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+14.8%
27
−14.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0.5%
200−210
−0.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+1.5%
65−70
−1.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−8.7%
25
+8.7%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+1.9%
53
−1.9%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
God of War 27−30
−25%
35
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+4.5%
21−24
−4.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+0%
44
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+6.1%
33
−6.1%
Valorant 130−140
+0.7%
130−140
−0.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+4.5%
21−24
−4.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 75−80
+8.3%
72
−8.3%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+7.7%
26
−7.7%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
God of War 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+4%
24−27
−4%

This is how Quadro P4200 and RTX A2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 Mobile is 5% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A2000 Mobile is 5% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A2000 Mobile is 9% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P4200 is 40% faster.
  • in God of War, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX A2000 Mobile is 88% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is ahead in 36 tests (55%)
  • RTX A2000 Mobile is ahead in 15 tests (23%)
  • there's a draw in 14 tests (22%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.14 22.97
Recency 21 February 2018 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 95 Watt

Quadro P4200 has a 0.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX A2000 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 5.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro P4200 and RTX A2000 Mobile.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P4200
Quadro P4200
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
RTX A2000 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 61 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 110 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P4200 or RTX A2000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.