Quadro P4200 Max-Q vs Quadro P2000 Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro P2000 Mobile and Quadro P4200 Max-Q, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
P4200 Max-Q outperforms P2000 Mobile by an impressive 96% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 383 | 223 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 14.48 | 21.29 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
| GPU code name | GP106 | GP104 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 15 February 2019 (6 years ago) | 21 February 2018 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1152 | 2304 |
| Core clock speed | 1291 MHz | 1215 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1291 MHz | 1480 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 4,400 million | 7,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 92.95 | 213.1 |
| Floating-point processing power | 2.974 TFLOPS | 6.82 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 64 |
| TMUs | 72 | 144 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3.75 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1502 MHz | 1753 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.13 GB/s | 224.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.7 (6.4) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 6.1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 14.25 | 27.93 |
| Recency | 15 February 2019 | 21 February 2018 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3.75 GB | 8 GB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
P2000 Mobile has an age advantage of 11 months, and 33.3% lower power consumption.
P4200 Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 96% higher aggregate performance score, and a 113.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.
The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P2000 Mobile in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
