GeForce RTX 4090 vs Quadro M6000 24 GB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M2000 M3000 SE M4000 M5000 M5000 SE M6000 M6000 24 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
4010 4060 4060 AD106 4060 Ti 4060 Ti 16 GB 4060 Ti AD104 4070 4070 AD103 4070 GDDR6 4070 SUPER 4070 Ti 4070 Ti SUPER 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 4080 4080 SUPER 4090 4090 D

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M6000 24 GB with GeForce RTX 4090, including specs and performance data.

M6000 24 GB
2016
24 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
28.12

RTX 4090 outperforms M6000 24 GB by a whopping 224% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
M6000 24 GB M6000 24 GB
RTX 4090 RTX 4090

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2213
Place by popularitynot in top-10090
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.1830.81
Power efficiency8.5715.44
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGM200AD102
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date5 March 2016 (9 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,999 $1,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RTX 4090 has 2511% better value for money than M6000 24 GB.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores307216384
Core clock speed988 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speed1114 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt450 Watt
Texture fill rate285.21,290
Floating-point processing power6.844 TFLOPS82.58 TFLOPS
ROPs96176
TMUs256512
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Coresno data128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm304 mm
Width2-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount24 GB24 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1653 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth317.4 GB/s1.01 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA5.28.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

M6000 24 GB 28.12
RTX 4090 91.14
+224%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

M6000 24 GB 11782
RTX 4090 38193
+224%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75−80
−236%
252
+236%
1440p55−60
−247%
191
+247%
4K40−45
−248%
139
+248%

Cost per frame, $

1080p66.65
−950%
6.35
+950%
1440p90.89
−986%
8.37
+986%
4K124.98
−986%
11.50
+986%
  • RTX 4090 has 950% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RTX 4090 has 986% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RTX 4090 has 986% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 351
+0%
351
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 227
+0%
227
+0%
God of War 246
+0%
246
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 340
+0%
340
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 224
+0%
224
+0%
Far Cry 5 209
+0%
209
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 281
+0%
281
+0%
God of War 245
+0%
245
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 650−700
+0%
650−700
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 340
+0%
340
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 215
+0%
215
+0%
Dota 2 253
+0%
253
+0%
Far Cry 5 201
+0%
201
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 275
+0%
275
+0%
God of War 243
+0%
243
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 174
+0%
174
+0%
Metro Exodus 228
+0%
228
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 573
+0%
573
+0%
Valorant 650−700
+0%
650−700
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 211
+0%
211
+0%
Dota 2 224
+0%
224
+0%
Far Cry 5 187
+0%
187
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
God of War 206
+0%
206
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 304
+0%
304
+0%
Valorant 680
+0%
680
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 312
+0%
312
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 162
+0%
162
+0%
Metro Exodus 179
+0%
179
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 159
+0%
159
+0%
Far Cry 5 186
+0%
186
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
God of War 180
+0%
180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 259
+0%
259
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 166
+0%
166
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 187
+0%
187
+0%
Metro Exodus 136
+0%
136
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 280
+0%
280
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 81
+0%
81
+0%
Dota 2 227
+0%
227
+0%
Far Cry 5 169
+0%
169
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
God of War 127
+0%
127
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how M6000 24 GB and RTX 4090 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4090 is 236% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4090 is 247% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4090 is 248% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 28.12 91.14
Recency 5 March 2016 20 September 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 450 Watt

M6000 24 GB has 80% lower power consumption.

RTX 4090, on the other hand, has a 224.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4090 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M6000 24 GB in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M6000 24 GB is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4090 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
Quadro M6000 24 GB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
GeForce RTX 4090
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

M6000 24 GB Quadro M6000 24 GB
vs
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
RTX 4090 GeForce RTX 4090
vs
RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090
M6000 24 GB Quadro M6000 24 GB
vs
Tesla P40 Tesla P40
RTX A4000 RTX A4000
vs
M6000 24 GB 24 GB
RX 6600 AMD RX 6600
vs
M6000 24 GB 24 GB
Tesla M40 24 GB NVIDIA M40 24 GB
vs
M6000 24 GB 24 GB
RTX A4500 RTX A4500
vs
M6000 24 GB 24 GB
RTX A2000 12 GB NVIDIA A2000 12 GB
vs
M6000 24 GB 24 GB
Tesla T4 Tesla T4
vs
Tesla M4 M4
Tesla K40m Tesla K40m
vs
Tesla M40 M40
P104-100 P104 100
vs
Tesla M40 M40
P106-100 P106 100
vs
Tesla M40 M40
Instinct MI25 Radeon Instinct MI25
vs
Tesla M40 M40

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.3 18 votes

Rate Quadro M6000 24 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 17699 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M6000 24 GB or GeForce RTX 4090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.