Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Quadro M5500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M1000M M1200 M2000M M2200 M3000M M4000M M5000M M5500
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
T400 Mobile T500 Mobile T600 Mobile T1000 Mobile T1000 Max-Q T1200 Max-Q T1200 Mobile T2000 Mobile T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M5500 and Quadro T1200 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro M5500
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
18.89
+8.3%

M5500 outperforms T1200 Mobile by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro M5500 Quadro M5500
T1200 Mobile T1200 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking308334
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.6073.93
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGM204TU117
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date8 April 2016 (9 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481024
Core clock speed1140 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speed1165 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate149.191.20
Floating-point processing power4.772 TFLOPS2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs12864

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth211 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.2no data
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
VR Ready+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.2
CUDA+7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60−65
+3.4%
58
−3.4%
1440p35−40
+6.1%
33
−6.1%
4K85−90
+4.9%
81
−4.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+9%
100−105
−9%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
God of War 40−45
+11.1%
35−40
−11.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+6.7%
75−80
−6.7%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+9%
100−105
−9%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−3.2%
65
+3.2%
Fortnite 100−110
+6.3%
95−100
−6.3%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+6.8%
70−75
−6.8%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+8.9%
55−60
−8.9%
God of War 40−45
+11.1%
35−40
−11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+9%
65−70
−9%
Valorant 140−150
+5.1%
130−140
−5.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+6.7%
75−80
−6.7%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+9%
100−105
−9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+4.5%
220−230
−4.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Dota 2 100−110
−4.6%
114
+4.6%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+6.8%
59
−6.8%
Fortnite 100−110
+6.3%
95−100
−6.3%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+6.8%
70−75
−6.8%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+8.9%
55−60
−8.9%
God of War 40−45
+11.1%
35−40
−11.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+0%
71
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+7.9%
35−40
−7.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+9%
65−70
−9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−31.5%
71
+31.5%
Valorant 140−150
+5.1%
130−140
−5.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+6.7%
75−80
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Dota 2 100−110
+1.9%
107
−1.9%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+12.5%
56
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+6.8%
70−75
−6.8%
God of War 40−45
+11.1%
35−40
−11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+9%
65−70
−9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+45.9%
37
−45.9%
Valorant 140−150
+10.8%
130−140
−10.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+6.3%
95−100
−6.3%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+7.7%
130−140
−7.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−12.1%
37
+12.1%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+8.7%
21−24
−8.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+14%
150−160
−14%
Valorant 170−180
+4.7%
170−180
−4.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+10%
50−55
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+4.9%
41
−4.9%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+9.1%
40−45
−9.1%
God of War 21−24
+10%
20−22
−10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+7.3%
40−45
−7.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+9.4%
30−35
−9.4%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+12%
24−27
−12%
Valorant 110−120
+10%
100−105
−10%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Dota 2 65−70
−65.2%
109
+65.2%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+10%
20−22
−10%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+9.7%
30−35
−9.7%
God of War 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%

1440p
High Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

This is how Quadro M5500 and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Quadro M5500 is 3% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro M5500 is 6% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro M5500 is 5% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro M5500 is 46% faster.
  • in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 65% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro M5500 is ahead in 44 tests (86%)
  • T1200 Mobile is ahead in 5 tests (10%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 18.89 17.45
Recency 8 April 2016 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 18 Watt

Quadro M5500 has a 8.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T1200 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro M5500 and Quadro T1200 Mobile.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro M5500
Quadro M5500
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200 Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro M5500 Quadro M5500
vs
T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile
T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200 Mobile
vs
T600 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile
Quadro M5500 Quadro M5500
vs
P4000 Mobile Quadro P4000 Mobile
GTX 980 Mobile NVIDIA GTX 980 Mobile
vs
RX 6500M 6500M
GTX 980 Mobile NVIDIA GTX 980 Mobile
vs
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
GTX 980 Mobile NVIDIA 980 Mobile
vs
RTX 4060 Mobile 4060 Mobile
Quadro M5500 Quadro M5500
vs
M5000M M5000M
Quadro M5500 Quadro M5500
vs
Pro WX 7100 WX 7100
GTX 970M SLI NVIDIA GTX 970M SLI
vs
R9 M290X Crossfire M290X Crossfire
GTX 970M SLI GeForce GTX 970M SLI
vs
GTX 970M GeForce GTX 970M
GTX 970M SLI GeForce GTX 970M SLI
vs
GTX 1050 Ti GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GTX 970M SLI NVIDIA GTX 970M SLI
vs
HD 8970M Crossfire 8970M Crossfire
GTX 970M SLI GeForce GTX 970M SLI
vs
GTX 1660 GeForce GTX 1660

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

1.5 41 votes

Rate Quadro M5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 155 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M5500 or Quadro T1200 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.