Radeon Pro 560X vs Quadro K5200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro K5200 Quadro K6000 K40d K40m K40s K40st K40t
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Pro 555 Pro 555X Pro 560 Pro 560X Pro 570 Pro 570X Pro 575 Pro 575X Pro 580 Pro 580X

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K5200 with Radeon Pro 560X, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K5200
2014
8 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
14.75
+68.2%

K5200 outperforms Pro 560X by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
Pro 560X Pro 560X

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking379514
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.95no data
Power efficiency7.508.92
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGK110BPolaris 21
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date22 July 2014 (11 years ago)16 July 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,699.74 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041024
Core clock speed667 MHz1004 MHz
Boost clock speed771 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,080 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate148.064.26
Floating-point processing power3.553 TFLOPS2.056 TFLOPS
ROPs4816
TMUs19264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1270 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s81.28 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA3.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro K5200 14.75
+68.2%
Pro 560X 8.77

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K5200 6179
+68%
Pro 560X 3677

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro K5200 19174
+9.2%
Pro 560X 17557

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Quadro K5200 20066
+18.4%
Pro 560X 16953

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD65−70
+58.5%
41
−58.5%
1440p70−75
+62.8%
43
−62.8%
4K27−30
+58.8%
17
−58.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p26.15no data
1440p24.28no data
4K62.95no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
God of War 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 43
+0%
43
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 37
+0%
37
+0%
Fortnite 66
+0%
66
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 53
+0%
53
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
God of War 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 36
+0%
36
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 86
+0%
86
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Dota 2 71
+0%
71
+0%
Far Cry 5 33
+0%
33
+0%
Fortnite 40
+0%
40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50
+0%
50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
God of War 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 33
+0%
33
+0%
Metro Exodus 19
+0%
19
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40
+0%
40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 34
+0%
34
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 33
+0%
33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Dota 2 69
+0%
69
+0%
Far Cry 5 31
+0%
31
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 36
+0%
36
+0%
God of War 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
+0%
20
+0%
Valorant 26
+0%
26
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 32
+0%
32
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 57
+0%
57
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 11
+0%
11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
God of War 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30
+0%
30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
+0%
13
+0%
Metro Exodus 7
+0%
7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 10
+0%
10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
God of War 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

This is how Quadro K5200 and Pro 560X compete in popular games:

  • Quadro K5200 is 59% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro K5200 is 63% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro K5200 is 59% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 14.75 8.77
Recency 22 July 2014 16 July 2018
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 75 Watt

Quadro K5200 has a 68.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Pro 560X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Quadro K5200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 560X in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K5200 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Pro 560X is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro K5200
Quadro K5200
AMD Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560X
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
Tesla M6 Tesla M6
Pro 560X Radeon Pro 560X
vs
Quadro P620 Quadro P620
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
RTX A400 RTX A400
T400 4 GB T400 4 GB
vs
Tesla M6 Tesla M6
T600 T600
vs
Quadro M5000 M5000
RTX 2050 Max-Q RTX 2050 Max-Q
vs
Quadro M5000 M5000
FirePro V4900 V4900
vs
Quadro K1200 K1200
Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 7 Cores iGPU
vs
Tesla K80m Tesla K80m
T1000 8 GB T1000 8 GB
vs
Quadro K5200 K5200
FX 5200 FX 5200
vs
Quadro K620 K620
RX 7800 XT RX 7800 XT
vs
Tesla K40c Tesla K40c
RX 6300 XT RX 6300 XT
vs
Quadro K2000 K2000
HD Graphics 530 HD Graphics 530
vs
Quadro K4000 K4000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 51 votes

Rate Quadro K5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 201 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 560X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K5200 or Radeon Pro 560X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.