Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB vs NVS 5100M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1277not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.02no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameGT216Navi 31
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date7 January 2010 (15 years ago)13 April 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores484480
Core clock speed550 MHz1895 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2525 MHz
Number of transistors486 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt281 Watt
Texture fill rate8.800707.0
Floating-point processing power0.1162 TFLOPS45.25 TFLOPS
ROPs8128
TMUs16280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data280 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB48 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s864.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2010 13 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 281 Watt

NVS 5100M has 702.9% lower power consumption.

PRO W7800 48 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between NVS 5100M and Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that NVS 5100M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 5100M
NVS 5100M
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB
Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 36 votes

Rate NVS 5100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 5100M or Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.