H3C XG310 vs Matrox Parhelia DL256

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureParhelia (2002−2006)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameParhelia-512DG1
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2003 (22 years ago)11 November 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768 ×4
Core clock speed200 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors80 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data300 Watt
Texture fill rate3.20052.80 ×4
Floating-point processing powerno data1.69 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs424 ×4
TMUs1648 ×4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCI-XPCIe 3.0 x16
Length190 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRLPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB ×4
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed500 MBps2133 MHz
Memory bandwidth4 GB/s68.26 GB/s ×4

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x LFH60No outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 10 nm

H3C XG310 has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox Parhelia DL256 and H3C XG310. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Matrox Parhelia DL256 is a desktop graphics card while H3C XG310 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Matrox Parhelia DL256
Parhelia DL256
Intel H3C XG310
H3C XG310

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox Parhelia DL256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7 votes

Rate H3C XG310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Matrox Parhelia DL256 or H3C XG310, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.