UHD Graphics 750 vs Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) with UHD Graphics 750, including specs and performance data.
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) outperforms UHD Graphics 750 by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 656 | 706 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 15.21 | 21.03 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) |
| GPU code name | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 | Rocket Lake GT1 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 28 May 2019 (6 years ago) | 30 March 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 64 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12-25 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 20.80 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 0.6656 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 8 |
| TMUs | no data | 16 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | Ring Bus |
| Width | no data | IGP |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR4 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | no data | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | no data | System Shared |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.2 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 18
+28.6%
| 14−16
−28.6%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 32
+77.8%
|
18−20
−77.8%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+25%
|
8−9
−25%
|
| God of War | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 18
+5.9%
|
16−18
−5.9%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 28
+55.6%
|
18−20
−55.6%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+25%
|
8−9
−25%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12
−8.3%
|
12−14
+8.3%
|
| Fortnite | 32
+33.3%
|
24−27
−33.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 13
−53.8%
|
20−22
+53.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 15
+36.4%
|
10−12
−36.4%
|
| God of War | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 20−22
+17.6%
|
16−18
−17.6%
|
| Valorant | 60−65
+12.7%
|
55−60
−12.7%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 16
−6.3%
|
16−18
+6.3%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 6
−200%
|
18−20
+200%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 39
−89.7%
|
70−75
+89.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+25%
|
8−9
−25%
|
| Dota 2 | 30
+25%
|
24−27
−25%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 10
−30%
|
12−14
+30%
|
| Fortnite | 25
+4.2%
|
24−27
−4.2%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+15%
|
20−22
−15%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 14−16
+27.3%
|
10−12
−27.3%
|
| God of War | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 9
−44.4%
|
12−14
+44.4%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5
−60%
|
8−9
+60%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 20−22
+17.6%
|
16−18
−17.6%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18
+50%
|
12−14
−50%
|
| Valorant | 60−65
+12.7%
|
55−60
−12.7%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+23.5%
|
16−18
−23.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+25%
|
8−9
−25%
|
| Dota 2 | 28
+33.3%
|
21−24
−33.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 11
−18.2%
|
12−14
+18.2%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+15%
|
20−22
−15%
|
| God of War | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 20−22
+17.6%
|
16−18
−17.6%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9
−33.3%
|
12−14
+33.3%
|
| Valorant | 60−65
+12.7%
|
55−60
−12.7%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 15
−60%
|
24−27
+60%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
+25%
|
8−9
−25%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 35−40
+21.9%
|
30−35
−21.9%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
| Metro Exodus | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+9.1%
|
30−35
−9.1%
|
| Valorant | 55−60
+24.4%
|
45−50
−24.4%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
+28.6%
|
7−8
−28.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
+20%
|
10−11
−20%
|
| God of War | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 10−11
+25%
|
8−9
−25%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
+6.3%
|
16−18
−6.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 24−27
+19%
|
21−24
−19%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 16−18
+21.4%
|
14−16
−21.4%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
+40%
|
5−6
−40%
|
| God of War | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
This is how Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and UHD Graphics 750 compete in popular games:
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is 29% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is 150% faster.
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 750 is 200% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) performs better in 43 tests (75%)
- UHD Graphics 750 performs better in 11 tests (19%)
- there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.99 | 4.14 |
| Recency | 28 May 2019 | 30 March 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 15 Watt |
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) has a 20.5% higher aggregate performance score, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.
UHD Graphics 750, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 750 in performance tests.
Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is a notebook graphics card while UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
