Iris Plus Graphics vs HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) with Iris Plus Graphics, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
2011
0.31

Plus Graphics outperforms HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) by a whopping 1206% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1351706
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.80
ArchitectureGen. 6 Sandy Bridge (2011)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameSandy BridgeIce Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 May 2011 (14 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6512
Core clock speed350 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology32 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data32.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.024 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus width64/128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.112 (12_1)
OpenGLno data4.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD7
−1186%
90−95
+1186%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
Valorant 24−27
−1054%
300−310
+1054%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10
−1200%
130−140
+1200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Dota 2 10−11
−1200%
130−140
+1200%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Valorant 24−27
−1054%
300−310
+1054%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Dota 2 10−11
−1200%
130−140
+1200%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Valorant 24−27
−1054%
300−310
+1054%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1167%
190−200
+1167%
Valorant 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

This is how HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) and Iris Plus Graphics compete in popular games:

  • Iris Plus Graphics is 1186% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.31 4.05
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm

Iris Plus Graphics has a 1206.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The Iris Plus Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) is a notebook graphics card while Iris Plus Graphics is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics
Iris Plus Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 97 votes

Rate HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 469 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) or Iris Plus Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.