RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) with RTX 2000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) by a whopping 333% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 480 | 105 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 36.05 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 44.50 |
| Architecture | Xe LPG (2023) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) |
| GPU code name | Meteor Lake iGPU | AD107 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 14 December 2023 (1 year ago) | 12 February 2024 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $649 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4 | 2816 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 1620 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1950 MHz | 2130 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 18,900 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 70 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 187.4 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 48 |
| TMUs | no data | 88 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 88 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 22 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Length | no data | 168 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 256.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 8.9 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 25
−300%
| 100−110
+300%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | no data | 6.49 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 13
−323%
|
55−60
+323%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
−329%
|
180−190
+329%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 11
−309%
|
45−50
+309%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
−319%
|
130−140
+319%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50
−320%
|
210−220
+320%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30
−314%
|
120−130
+314%
|
| God of War | 18−20
−321%
|
80−85
+321%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
−312%
|
140−150
+312%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
−280%
|
350−400
+280%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
−329%
|
180−190
+329%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 13
−323%
|
55−60
+323%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 20−22
−325%
|
85−90
+325%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24
−317%
|
100−105
+317%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
−331%
|
250−260
+331%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 39
−310%
|
160−170
+310%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30
−314%
|
120−130
+314%
|
| God of War | 18−20
−321%
|
80−85
+321%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 15
−300%
|
60−65
+300%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
−321%
|
80−85
+321%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
−312%
|
140−150
+312%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
−300%
|
100−105
+300%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
−280%
|
350−400
+280%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
−329%
|
180−190
+329%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
−323%
|
220−230
+323%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 20−22
−325%
|
85−90
+325%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
−319%
|
130−140
+319%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
−331%
|
250−260
+331%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30
−300%
|
120−130
+300%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30
−314%
|
120−130
+314%
|
| God of War | 18−20
−321%
|
80−85
+321%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
−312%
|
140−150
+312%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
−280%
|
350−400
+280%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 70−75
−311%
|
300−310
+311%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
−275%
|
30−33
+275%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14
−323%
|
55−60
+323%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−12
−309%
|
45−50
+309%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
−329%
|
210−220
+329%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
−317%
|
100−105
+317%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
−317%
|
75−80
+317%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
−325%
|
85−90
+325%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
−313%
|
95−100
+313%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 10−11
−300%
|
40−45
+300%
|
| God of War | 10−11
−300%
|
40−45
+300%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
−323%
|
55−60
+323%
|
| Valorant | 100−110
−325%
|
450−500
+325%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−300%
|
12−14
+300%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−300%
|
12−14
+300%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 21−24
−329%
|
90−95
+329%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6
−320%
|
21−24
+320%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
−300%
|
40−45
+300%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
−317%
|
50−55
+317%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−300%
|
12−14
+300%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
−289%
|
35−40
+289%
|
| Fortnite | 9−10
−289%
|
35−40
+289%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
−306%
|
65−70
+306%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 7−8
−329%
|
30−33
+329%
|
| God of War | 7−8
−329%
|
30−33
+329%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−289%
|
35−40
+289%
|
| Valorant | 50−55
−320%
|
210−220
+320%
|
This is how Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:
- RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 300% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.45 | 40.89 |
| Recency | 14 December 2023 | 12 February 2024 |
RTX 2000 Ada Generation has a 332.7% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 month.
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) in performance tests.
Be aware that Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook graphics card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
