Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile with Radeon RX 7650 GRE, including specs and performance data.

RTX 5050 Mobile
2025
8 GB GDDR6, 50 Watt
42.67
+40.1%

RTX 5050 Mobile outperforms RX 7650 GRE by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking97192
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data56.08
Power efficiency65.0514.07
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0 (2025)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameGB207Navi 33
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date24 June 2025 (recently)February 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$279

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602048
Core clock speed2235 MHz1720 MHz
Boost clock speed2520 MHz2695 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt165 Watt
Texture fill rate201.6345.0
Floating-point processing power12.9 TFLOPS22.08 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs80128
Tensor Cores80no data
Ray Tracing Cores2032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data204 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.41.3
CUDA12.0-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 5050 Mobile 42.67
+40.1%
RX 7650 GRE 30.45

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 5050 Mobile 18075
+40.1%
RX 7650 GRE 12899

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+48.1%
160−170
−48.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+47.1%
70−75
−47.1%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 120−130
+42.4%
85−90
−42.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+48.1%
160−170
−48.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+47.1%
70−75
−47.1%
Fortnite 180−190
+43.1%
130−140
−43.1%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+42.1%
95−100
−42.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+50%
110−120
−50%
Valorant 240−250
+44.7%
170−180
−44.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+48.1%
160−170
−48.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+46.8%
190−200
−46.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+47.1%
70−75
−47.1%
Fortnite 180−190
+43.1%
130−140
−43.1%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+42.1%
95−100
−42.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 130−140
+45.3%
95−100
−45.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+50%
110−120
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160−170
+46.4%
110−120
−46.4%
Valorant 240−250
+44.7%
170−180
−44.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+47.1%
70−75
−47.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+50%
110−120
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160−170
+46.4%
110−120
−46.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 180−190
+43.1%
130−140
−43.1%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+43.8%
80−85
−43.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
+45.2%
210−220
−45.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 90−95
+51.7%
60−65
−51.7%
Valorant 270−280
+44.7%
190−200
−44.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+51.4%
35−40
−51.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+45%
60−65
−45%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+47.5%
80−85
−47.5%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+51.4%
35−40
−51.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 95−100
+50.8%
65−70
−50.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+44%
50−55
−44%
Valorant 260−270
+46.1%
180−190
−46.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+42.2%
45−50
−42.2%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+47.5%
40−45
−47.5%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.67 30.45
Chip lithography 5 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 165 Watt

RTX 5050 Mobile has a 40.1% higher aggregate performance score, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 230% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 7650 GRE in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 7650 GRE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile
AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE
Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 64 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 23 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7650 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile or Radeon RX 7650 GRE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.