GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB vs RTX 3060 Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile and GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RTX 3060 Mobile outperforms GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB by a whopping 163% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 207 | 440 |
| Place by popularity | 94 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 28.52 | 11.58 |
| Architecture | Ampere (2020−2025) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
| GPU code name | GA106 | GP107 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 12 January 2021 (4 years ago) | 1 February 2019 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3840 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1366 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 1442 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 13,250 million | 3,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 171.0 | 69.22 |
| Floating-point processing power | 10.94 TFLOPS | 2.215 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 | 24 |
| TMUs | 120 | 48 |
| Tensor Cores | 120 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 96 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 1752 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 336.0 GB/s | 84.1 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| CUDA | 8.6 | 6.1 |
| DLSS | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 97
+177%
| 35−40
−177%
|
| 1440p | 64
+167%
| 24−27
−167%
|
| 4K | 39
+179%
| 14−16
−179%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 170−180
+163%
|
65−70
−163%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 103
+194%
|
35−40
−194%
|
| God of War | 65−70
+188%
|
24−27
−188%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 110−120
+183%
|
40−45
−183%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 170−180
+163%
|
65−70
−163%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 86
+187%
|
30−33
−187%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 112
+180%
|
40−45
−180%
|
| Fortnite | 130−140
+178%
|
50−55
−178%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120
+164%
|
45−50
−164%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 120
+167%
|
45−50
−167%
|
| God of War | 91
+203%
|
30−33
−203%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 120−130
+171%
|
45−50
−171%
|
| Valorant | 190−200
+174%
|
70−75
−174%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 141
+182%
|
50−55
−182%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 170−180
+163%
|
65−70
−163%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280
+175%
|
100−105
−175%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 69
+188%
|
24−27
−188%
|
| Dota 2 | 131
+191%
|
45−50
−191%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 106
+165%
|
40−45
−165%
|
| Fortnite | 130−140
+178%
|
50−55
−178%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120
+164%
|
45−50
−164%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 101
+189%
|
35−40
−189%
|
| God of War | 73
+170%
|
27−30
−170%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 121
+169%
|
45−50
−169%
|
| Metro Exodus | 81
+170%
|
30−33
−170%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 120−130
+171%
|
45−50
−171%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 142
+184%
|
50−55
−184%
|
| Valorant | 189
+170%
|
70−75
−170%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 131
+191%
|
45−50
−191%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 62
+195%
|
21−24
−195%
|
| Dota 2 | 124
+176%
|
45−50
−176%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 101
+189%
|
35−40
−189%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120
+164%
|
45−50
−164%
|
| God of War | 52
+189%
|
18−20
−189%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 120−130
+171%
|
45−50
−171%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 78
+189%
|
27−30
−189%
|
| Valorant | 172
+165%
|
65−70
−165%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 130−140
+178%
|
50−55
−178%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75
+192%
|
24−27
−192%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 210−220
+165%
|
80−85
−165%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 75
+178%
|
27−30
−178%
|
| Metro Exodus | 50
+178%
|
18−20
−178%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+169%
|
65−70
−169%
|
| Valorant | 304
+176%
|
110−120
−176%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 104
+197%
|
35−40
−197%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 39
+179%
|
14−16
−179%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 84
+180%
|
30−33
−180%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 80−85
+173%
|
30−33
−173%
|
| God of War | 43
+169%
|
16−18
−169%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 50−55
+194%
|
18−20
−194%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 75−80
+181%
|
27−30
−181%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+167%
|
12−14
−167%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 73
+170%
|
27−30
−170%
|
| Metro Exodus | 31
+210%
|
10−11
−210%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 55
+206%
|
18−20
−206%
|
| Valorant | 180−190
+182%
|
65−70
−182%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 63
+200%
|
21−24
−200%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+167%
|
12−14
−167%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 15
+200%
|
5−6
−200%
|
| Dota 2 | 95
+171%
|
35−40
−171%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 40
+186%
|
14−16
−186%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
+206%
|
18−20
−206%
|
| God of War | 30
+200%
|
10−11
−200%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+200%
|
12−14
−200%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 35−40
+200%
|
12−14
−200%
|
This is how RTX 3060 Mobile and GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB compete in popular games:
- RTX 3060 Mobile is 177% faster in 1080p
- RTX 3060 Mobile is 167% faster in 1440p
- RTX 3060 Mobile is 179% faster in 4K
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 29.95 | 11.40 |
| Recency | 12 January 2021 | 1 February 2019 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 3 GB |
| Chip lithography | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 75 Watt |
RTX 3060 Mobile has a 162.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.
GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB, on the other hand, has 6.7% lower power consumption.
The GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
