GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) vs RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1367
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.84
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)no data
GPU code nameTU106BMCP79MX
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date19 January 2020 (5 years ago)14 October 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230416
Core clock speed1305 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1485 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,800 million282 Million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate213.8no data
Floating-point processing power6.843 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs144no data
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores36no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)10.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.140-
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 January 2020 14 October 2008
Chip lithography 12 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 12 Watt

RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

9400M (G) / ION (LE), on the other hand, has 858.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh and GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE). We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh
NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 32 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 37 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh or GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.