Radeon 660M vs GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated544
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.91
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameTU117BRembrandt+
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 April 2020 (5 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024384
Core clock speed1380 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1515 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate96.9645.60
Floating-point processing power3.103 TFLOPS1.459 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs6424
Ray Tracing Coresno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1401.3
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 April 2020 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 40 Watt

Radeon 660M has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh and Radeon 660M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh
AMD Radeon 660M
Radeon 660M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 182 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 403 votes

Rate Radeon 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh or Radeon 660M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.