Quadro P5200 Max-Q vs GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile with Quadro P5200 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1070 SLI Mobile
2016
2x 8 GB GDDR5
40.19
+36.8%

GTX 1070 SLI Mobile outperforms P5200 Max-Q by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking113212
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.39
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code namePascal GP104 SLIGP104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date16 August 2016 (8 years ago)21 February 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40962560
Core clock speed1443 MHz1316 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHz1569 MHz
Number of transistors14400 Million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data100 Watt
Texture fill rateno data251.0
Floating-point processing powerno data8.033 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz1804 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data230.9 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA+6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD138
+38%
100−110
−38%
4K78
+41.8%
55−60
−41.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+38.8%
160−170
−38.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+46.2%
65−70
−46.2%
God of War 95−100
+41.4%
70−75
−41.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+43.2%
95−100
−43.2%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+38.8%
160−170
−38.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+46.2%
65−70
−46.2%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+43.3%
90−95
−43.3%
Fortnite 170−180
+45%
120−130
−45%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+41.8%
110−120
−41.8%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+41.1%
90−95
−41.1%
God of War 95−100
+41.4%
70−75
−41.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+43.6%
110−120
−43.6%
Valorant 230−240
+37.1%
170−180
−37.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+43.2%
95−100
−43.2%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+38.8%
160−170
−38.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+39%
200−210
−39%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+46.2%
65−70
−46.2%
Dota 2 140−150
+46%
100−105
−46%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+43.3%
90−95
−43.3%
Fortnite 170−180
+45%
120−130
−45%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+41.8%
110−120
−41.8%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+41.1%
90−95
−41.1%
God of War 95−100
+41.4%
70−75
−41.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 130−140
+38.9%
95−100
−38.9%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+40%
70−75
−40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 102
+45.7%
70−75
−45.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 168
+40%
120−130
−40%
Valorant 230−240
+37.1%
170−180
−37.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+43.2%
95−100
−43.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+46.2%
65−70
−46.2%
Dota 2 140−150
+46%
100−105
−46%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+43.3%
90−95
−43.3%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+41.8%
110−120
−41.8%
God of War 95−100
+41.4%
70−75
−41.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 93
+43.1%
65−70
−43.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100
+42.9%
70−75
−42.9%
Valorant 230−240
+37.1%
170−180
−37.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 170−180
+45%
120−130
−45%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+38.7%
75−80
−38.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 280−290
+41.5%
200−210
−41.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
+38.3%
60−65
−38.3%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+50%
40−45
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+45.8%
120−130
−45.8%
Valorant 260−270
+38.9%
190−200
−38.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+37.3%
75−80
−37.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+37.1%
35−40
−37.1%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+41.4%
70−75
−41.4%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+37.6%
85−90
−37.6%
God of War 50−55
+54.3%
35−40
−54.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+41.8%
55−60
−41.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+44%
75−80
−44%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+37.1%
35−40
−37.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+36.9%
65−70
−36.9%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+44%
50−55
−44%
Valorant 240−250
+37.2%
180−190
−37.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+44.4%
45−50
−44.4%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+37.1%
35−40
−37.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Dota 2 110−120
+42.5%
80−85
−42.5%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+54.3%
35−40
−54.3%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+41.8%
55−60
−41.8%
God of War 35−40
+50%
24−27
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 37
+37%
27−30
−37%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+54.3%
35−40
−54.3%

This is how GTX 1070 SLI Mobile and P5200 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is 38% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is 42% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.19 29.37
Recency 16 August 2016 21 February 2018

GTX 1070 SLI Mobile has a 36.8% higher aggregate performance score.

P5200 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P5200 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P5200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Quadro P5200 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 105 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 16 votes

Rate Quadro P5200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile or Quadro P5200 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.