Radeon R7 360 896SP vs GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking769not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.19no data
Power efficiency5.09no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameGK208Tobago
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date29 May 2013 (12 years ago)18 June 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$89 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384896
Core clock speed1046 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors915 million2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate33.4761.60
Floating-point processing power0.8033 TFLOPS1.971 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs3256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length145 mm183 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1252 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.06 GB/s96 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 May 2013 18 June 2015
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 85 Watt

GT 640 Rev. 2 has 73.5% lower power consumption.

R7 360 896SP, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 and Radeon R7 360 896SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP
Radeon R7 360 896SP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 29 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R7 360 896SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 or Radeon R7 360 896SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.