Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics vs GeForce 9400M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1404not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.52no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameC79Beema
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 October 2008 (16 years ago)28 January 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16128
Core clock speed580 MHz497 MHz
Boost clock speedno data300 MHz
Number of transistors314 million930 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate4.6403.976
Floating-point processing power0.0448 TFLOPS0.1272 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.3
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 October 2008 28 January 2015
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 100 Watt

GeForce 9400M has 733.3% lower power consumption.

R2 Mobile Graphics, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400M and Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400M
GeForce 9400M
AMD Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics
Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 44 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 61 votes

Rate Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400M or Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.