Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated353
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data24.43
Architectureno dataTuring (2018−2022)
GPU code nameno dataTU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date3 June 2008 (17 years ago)27 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24896
Core clock speedno data765 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data75.60
Floating-point processing powerno data2.419 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2008 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 65 nm 12 nm

T1000 Max-Q has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost and Quadro T1000 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost
GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Quadro T1000 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 14 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 18 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost or Quadro T1000 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.