GeForce RTX 5070 vs 710M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 710M with GeForce RTX 5070, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 710M
2013
1 GB DDR3, 15 Watt
1.04

RTX 5070 outperforms 710M by a whopping 6377% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking111219
Place by popularitynot in top-10022
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data72.92
Power efficiency5.4221.06
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGK208GB205
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date24 July 2013 (11 years ago)4 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1926144
Core clock speed719 MHz2325 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz2512 MHz
Number of transistors915 million31,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate11.50482.3
Floating-point processing power0.2761 TFLOPS30.87 TFLOPS
ROPs880
TMUs16192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount1 GB12 GB
Standard memory configurationDDR3no data
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 2560x1600no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 2560x1600no data
HDMI++
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.4
CUDA+10.1
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 710M 1.04
RTX 5070 67.36
+6377%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 710M 450
RTX 5070 29090
+6364%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GeForce 710M 1107
RTX 5070 71642
+6375%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GeForce 710M 4641
RTX 5070 137827
+2870%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GeForce 710M 769
RTX 5070 56472
+7248%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GeForce 710M 5323
RTX 5070 258137
+4749%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−7167%
218
+7167%
1440p1−2
−12300%
124
+12300%
4K1−2
−7600%
77
+7600%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.52
1440pno data4.43
4Kno data7.13

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−8750%
170−180
+8750%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 180−190
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−8750%
170−180
+8750%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−16000%
322
+16000%
Fortnite 2−3
−15000%
300−350
+15000%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−4583%
280−290
+4583%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 329
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1844%
170−180
+1844%
Valorant 30−35
−1216%
400−450
+1216%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 180−190
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−962%
270−280
+962%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−8750%
170−180
+8750%
Dota 2 14−16
−6233%
950−1000
+6233%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−15200%
306
+15200%
Fortnite 2−3
−15000%
300−350
+15000%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−4583%
280−290
+4583%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 299
Metro Exodus 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1844%
170−180
+1844%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−7167%
436
+7167%
Valorant 30−35
−1216%
400−450
+1216%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 180−190
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−8750%
170−180
+8750%
Dota 2 14−16
−6233%
950−1000
+6233%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−14400%
290
+14400%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−4583%
280−290
+4583%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1844%
170−180
+1844%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−3400%
210
+3400%
Valorant 30−35
−1216%
400−450
+1216%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−15000%
300−350
+15000%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−10800%
210−220
+10800%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
−8500%
500−550
+8500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−1491%
170−180
+1491%
Valorant 2−3
−24150%
450−500
+24150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 0−1 222
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−8100%
240−250
+8100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 166

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−7450%
150−160
+7450%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1020%
160−170
+1020%
Valorant 6−7
−5417%
300−350
+5417%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−4700%
95−100
+4700%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−3850%
75−80
+3850%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Sons of the Forest 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Sons of the Forest 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Sons of the Forest 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Sons of the Forest 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Sons of the Forest 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150
+0%
150
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 116
+0%
116
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Sons of the Forest 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

This is how GeForce 710M and RTX 5070 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5070 is 7167% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5070 is 12300% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5070 is 7600% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 5070 is 24150% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 5070 is ahead in 33 tests (60%)
  • there's a draw in 22 tests (40%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.04 67.36
Recency 24 July 2013 4 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 250 Watt

GeForce 710M has 1566.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 5070, on the other hand, has a 6376.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5070 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 710M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 710M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce RTX 5070 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 710M
GeForce 710M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
GeForce RTX 5070

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 745 votes

Rate GeForce 710M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3783 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 710M or GeForce RTX 5070, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.