Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs GeForce 6200 LE PCI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated705
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.26
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameNV43 A2Coffee Lake GT3e
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date11 October 2004 (20 years ago)7 October 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed300 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1050 MHz
Number of transistors146 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology110 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate1.20050.40
Floating-point processing powerno data0.8064 TFLOPS
ROPs26
TMUs448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIRing Bus
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed266 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth4.256 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 October 2004 7 October 2019
Chip lithography 110 nm 14 nm

Iris Plus Graphics 645 has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 6200 LE PCI and Iris Plus Graphics 645. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 6200 LE PCI is a desktop graphics card while Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 6200 LE PCI
GeForce 6200 LE PCI
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Iris Plus Graphics 645

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 9 votes

Rate GeForce 6200 LE PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 123 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 645 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 6200 LE PCI or Iris Plus Graphics 645, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.