T500 Max-Q vs ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameR300TU117
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date1 July 2002 (23 years ago)2 December 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data896
Core clock speed325 MHz795 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1425 MHz
Number of transistors110 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate2.60079.80
Floating-point processing powerno data2.554 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs856

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed310 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.84 GB/s80 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVIPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7 (6.4)
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2002 2 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 18 Watt

T500 Max-Q has an age advantage of 18 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 1150% more advanced lithography process, and 105.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FireGL 9700 X1-256 and T500 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL 9700 X1-256 is a workstation graphics card while T500 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256
FireGL 9700 X1-256
NVIDIA T500 Max-Q
T500 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate FireGL 9700 X1-256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate T500 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL 9700 X1-256 or T500 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.