Ryzen AI 5 330 vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1515 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 46 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 8.90 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 3 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 2.59 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Picasso (2019−2022) | Krackan Point 2 (2025) |
| Release date | 7 July 2019 (6 years ago) | 16 July 2025 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 3200G and Ryzen AI 5 330 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Bus type | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Multiplier | 36 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 210 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4,940 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 3200G and Ryzen AI 5 330 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Ryzen AI 5 330. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Ryzen AI 5 330 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Ryzen AI 5 330. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR5, LPDDR5X |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Vega 8 | AMD Radeon 820M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Ryzen AI 5 330.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 14 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 4.02 | 1.25 |
| Recency | 7 July 2019 | 16 July 2025 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 28 Watt |
Ryzen 3 3200G has 221.6% faster integrated GPU.
Ryzen AI 5 330, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more threads, a 200% more advanced lithography process, and 132.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen 3 3200G and AMD Ryzen AI 5 330. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 3 3200G is a desktop processor while Ryzen AI 5 330 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
