Athlon 1000 (C) vs Processor U300
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1316 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 18.32 | no data |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Raptor Lake-U | no data |
Power efficiency | 14.39 | no data |
Designer | Intel | AMD |
Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
Architecture codename | Raptor Lake-U (2023) | Thunderbird C (2000−2001) |
Release date | 4 January 2023 (2 years ago) | 31 October 2000 (24 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $193 | $385 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Processor U300 and Athlon 1000 (C) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 5 (Penta-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 6 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 1 GHz |
Bus rate | 55 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | 80K (per core) | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 256 KB |
L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | no data |
Chip lithography | 10 nm | 180 nm |
Die size | no data | 120 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | no data | 37 million |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Processor U300 and Athlon 1000 (C) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | Intel BGA 1744 | A |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 54 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor U300 and Athlon 1000 (C). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Processor U300 and Athlon 1000 (C) technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor U300 and Athlon 1000 (C) are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor U300 and Athlon 1000 (C). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel | DDR1 Depends on motherboard |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs ( - 1100 MHz) | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor U300 and Athlon 1000 (C).
PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 8 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 4 January 2023 | 31 October 2000 |
Physical cores | 5 | 1 |
Threads | 6 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 10 nm | 180 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 54 Watt |
Processor U300 has an age advantage of 22 years, 400% more physical cores and 500% more threads, a 1700% more advanced lithography process, and 260% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Processor U300 and AMD Athlon 1000 (C). We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Processor U300 is a notebook processor while Athlon 1000 (C) is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.