Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 vs Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 outperforms Phenom II X6 1100T BE by a whopping 808% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1673 | 163 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 1.10 | 22.78 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Thuban (2010) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| Release date | 7 December 2010 (14 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 6 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 346 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 904 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3 | FP11 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 8060S |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.45 | 31.32 |
| Recency | 7 December 2010 | 6 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 16 |
| Threads | 6 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 55 Watt |
Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 has a 807.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 166.7% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads, a 1025% more advanced lithography process, and 127.3% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE in performance tests.
Note that Phenom II X6 1100T BE is a desktop processor while Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
