Z-60 vs Pentium M 740
Aggregate performance score
Pentium M 740 outperforms Z-60 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3455 | 3498 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Pentium M | no data |
Power efficiency | 0.28 | 1.26 |
Designer | Intel | AMD |
Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Hondo (2012) |
Release date | 19 January 2005 (20 years ago) | 9 October 2012 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium M 740 and Z-60 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 1 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 1.73 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 1.73 GHz | 1 GHz |
Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | 32 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 40 nm |
Die size | 87 mm2 | 75 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 144 million | no data |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
VID voltage range | 1.26V-1.356V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium M 740 and Z-60 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | PPGA478, H-PBGA479 | FT1 BGA 413-Ball |
Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 740 and Z-60. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | - | no data |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Pentium M 740 and Z-60 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 740 and Z-60 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 740 and Z-60. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR3 Single-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | AMD Radeon HD 6250 (276 MHz) |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.18 | 0.15 |
Recency | 19 January 2005 | 9 October 2012 |
Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
Threads | 1 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 5 Watt |
Pentium M 740 has a 20% higher aggregate performance score.
Z-60, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 125% more advanced lithography process, and 440% lower power consumption.
The Intel Pentium M 740 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Z-60 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.