Celeron 807UE vs Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
Aggregate performance score
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ outperforms Celeron 807UE by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3415 | 3537 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Mobile Athlon 64 | Intel Celeron |
| Power efficiency | 0.10 | 0.59 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Clawhammer (2001−2005) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| Release date | August 2005 (20 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ and Celeron 807UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 2.0 |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 4 × 5 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 10 |
| L1 cache | 128K | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 1.5 MB |
| Chip lithography | no data | 32 nm |
| Die size | 193 mm2 | 131 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 106 million | 504 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ and Celeron 807UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | 754 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 81 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ and Celeron 807UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| FMA | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ and Celeron 807UE are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ and Celeron 807UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR3-1333 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 10.662 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.20 | 0.14 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 81 Watt | 10 Watt |
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ has a 42.9% higher aggregate performance score.
Celeron 807UE, on the other hand, has 710% lower power consumption.
The AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron 807UE in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
