Celeron N3050 vs MediaTek Kompanio 838

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

MediaTek Kompanio 838
2024
8 cores / 8 threads
2.89
+750%

MediaTek Kompanio 838 outperforms Celeron N3050 by a whopping 750% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18073261
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.01
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesMediatek MediaTek KompanioIntel Celeron
Power efficiencyno data2.40
Designerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameCortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024)Braswell (2015−2016)
Release date31 May 2024 (1 year ago)1 April 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

MediaTek Kompanio 838 and Celeron N3050 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2.16 GHz
Bus typeno dataIDI
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithographyno data14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on MediaTek Kompanio 838 and Celeron N3050 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataFCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)no data6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by MediaTek Kompanio 838 and Celeron N3050. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

MediaTek Kompanio 838 and Celeron N3050 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by MediaTek Kompanio 838 and Celeron N3050 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
VT-ino data-
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by MediaTek Kompanio 838 and Celeron N3050. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardARM Mali-G57 MP3Intel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 Series
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data600 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of MediaTek Kompanio 838 and Celeron N3050 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by MediaTek Kompanio 838 and Celeron N3050 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by MediaTek Kompanio 838 and Celeron N3050.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.89 0.34
Recency 31 May 2024 1 April 2015
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 8 2

MediaTek Kompanio 838 has a 750% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The MediaTek Kompanio 838 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron N3050 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


MediaTek Kompanio 838
Kompanio 838
Intel Celeron N3050
Celeron N3050

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate MediaTek Kompanio 838 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 595 votes

Rate Celeron N3050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors MediaTek Kompanio 838 and Celeron N3050, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.