EPYC 7302 vs EPYC Embedded 3451
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 357 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 9.91 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | AMD EPYC Embedded | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | no data | 5.20 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 21 February 2018 (7 years ago) | 7 August 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $880 | $978 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC Embedded 3451 and EPYC 7302 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 2.15 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Multiplier | 21.5 | 30 |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB (shared) | 32 MB (per die) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Die size | 2x 213 mm2 | 4x 74 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | 15,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC Embedded 3451 and EPYC 7302 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | AMD BGA SP4r2 | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 155 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC Embedded 3451 and EPYC 7302. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC Embedded 3451 and EPYC 7302 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC Embedded 3451 and EPYC 7302. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4 Eight-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 1 TiB | 4 TiB |
| Max memory channels | 4 | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 85.33 GB/s | 204.763 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC Embedded 3451 and EPYC 7302.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 64 | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 21 February 2018 | 7 August 2019 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 155 Watt |
EPYC Embedded 3451 has 55% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7302, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC Embedded 3451 and AMD EPYC 7302. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
