Processor N95 vs EPYC 7552
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7552 outperforms Processor N95 by a whopping 1040% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 137 | 1805 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 6.08 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD EPYC | Intel Alder Lake-N |
| Power efficiency | 6.90 | 8.07 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Alder Lake-N (2023) |
| Release date | 7 August 2019 (5 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4,025 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7552 and Processor N95 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 96 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 0.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Multiplier | 22 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 192 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 3,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7552 and Processor N95 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | SP3 | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7552 and Processor N95. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
EPYC 7552 and Processor N95 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7552 and Processor N95 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7552 and Processor N95. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.763 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1200 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7552 and Processor N95.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 32.84 | 2.88 |
| Recency | 7 August 2019 | 3 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 48 | 4 |
| Threads | 96 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | 15 Watt |
EPYC 7552 has a 1040.3% higher aggregate performance score, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
Processor N95, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 1233.3% lower power consumption.
The AMD EPYC 7552 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Processor N95 in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 7552 is a server/workstation processor while Processor N95 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
