FX-9800P vs i3-1115G4E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-1115G4E
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.98
+113%

Core i3-1115G4E outperforms FX-9800P by a whopping 113% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18082358
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.21no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency8.543.94
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameTiger Lake-U (2020−2021)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date2 September 2020 (5 years ago)31 May 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$285no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core i3-1115G4E and FX-9800P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)320 KB
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)1 MB (per module)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography10 nm28 nm
Die size144 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistorsno data3,100 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-1115G4E and FX-9800P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 1449FP4
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-1115G4E and FX-9800P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-1115G4E and FX-9800P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-1115G4E and FX-9800P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, LPDDR4XDDR3, DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardUHD Graphics G4 48EUAMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-1115G4E and FX-9800P.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes48

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i3-1115G4E 2.98
+113%
FX-9800P 1.40

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

i3-1115G4E 5231
+113%
Samples: 15
FX-9800P 2460
Samples: 162

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-1115G4E 1702
+242%
FX-9800P 498

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-1115G4E 2972
+164%
FX-9800P 1127

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.98 1.40
Recency 2 September 2020 31 May 2016
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm

i3-1115G4E has a 112.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

FX-9800P, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores.

The Intel Core i3-1115G4E is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD FX-9800P in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-1115G4E
Core i3-1115G4E
AMD FX-9800P
FX-9800P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Core i3-1115G4E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 45 votes

Rate FX-9800P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i3-1115G4E and FX-9800P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.