EPYC 7282 vs Solo T1400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Solo T1400
2006
1 core / 1 thread, 27 Watt
0.14
EPYC 7282
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 120 Watt
17.12
+12129%

EPYC 7282 outperforms Core Solo T1400 by a whopping 12129% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3518394
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data13.35
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesCore SoloAMD EPYC
Power efficiency0.226.04
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release dateJanuary 2006 (19 years ago)7 August 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$650

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core Solo T1400 and EPYC 7282 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads132
Base clock speed1.83 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
Multiplierno data28
L1 cache64 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size90 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors151 million4,800 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range1.1625V - 1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core Solo T1400 and EPYC 7282 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketPPGA478, PBGA479TR4
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo T1400 and EPYC 7282. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core Solo T1400 and EPYC 7282 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo T1400 and EPYC 7282 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo T1400 and EPYC 7282. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Solo T1400 0.14
EPYC 7282 17.12
+12129%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Solo T1400 253
EPYC 7282 30137
+11812%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.14 17.12
Physical cores 1 16
Threads 1 32
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 120 Watt

Solo T1400 has 344.4% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7282, on the other hand, has a 12128.6% higher aggregate performance score, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC 7282 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core Solo T1400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core Solo T1400 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7282 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Solo T1400
Core Solo T1400
AMD EPYC 7282
EPYC 7282

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 5 votes

Rate Core Solo T1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 52 votes

Rate EPYC 7282 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Solo T1400 and EPYC 7282, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.