Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX vs Core 2 Extreme X7900
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX outperforms Core 2 Extreme X7900 by a whopping 15773% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2945 | 1 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.01 | 2.25 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Extreme | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.61 | 12.08 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| Release date | 1 September 2007 (17 years ago) | 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $851 | $11,700 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX has 22400% better value for money than Core 2 Extreme X7900.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Extreme X7900 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 96 |
| Threads | 2 | 192 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 384 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 12x 70.6 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 99,780 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 1.1V-1.375V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Extreme X7900 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | sTR5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 44 Watt | 350 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme X7900 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| AMT | + | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core 2 Extreme X7900 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme X7900 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme X7900 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Extreme X7900 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 136 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.63 | 100.00 |
| Recency | 1 September 2007 | 23 July 2025 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 96 |
| Threads | 2 | 192 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 44 Watt | 350 Watt |
Core 2 Extreme X7900 has 695.5% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX, on the other hand, has a 15773% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, 4700% more physical cores and 9500% more threads, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Extreme X7900 in performance tests.
Be aware that Core 2 Extreme X7900 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
