Core i7-680UM vs Core 2 Duo T5550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo T5550
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.36
Core i7-680UM
2010, $317
2 cores / 4 threads, 18 Watt
0.68
+88.9%

Core i7-680UM outperforms Core 2 Duo T5550 by an impressive 89% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32902949
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.02
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core i7
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date1 January 2008 (17 years ago)26 September 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$317

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T5550 and Core i7-680UM basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.83 GHz1.46 GHz
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz2.53 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rate667 MHz1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplierno data11
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm32 nm
Die size143 mm281+144 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistors291 Million382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.075V-1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T5550 and Core i7-680UM compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPPGA478BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T5550 and Core i7-680UM. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-+
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T5550 and Core i7-680UM technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T5550 and Core i7-680UM are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T5550 and Core i7-680UM. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3-800
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data12.799 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data500 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core 2 Duo T5550 and Core i7-680UM integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo T5550 and Core i7-680UM.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Core 2 Duo T5550 0.36
i7-680UM 0.68
+88.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Core 2 Duo T5550 634
Samples: 263
i7-680UM 1196
+88.6%
Samples: 13

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.36 0.68
Recency 1 January 2008 26 September 2010
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 18 Watt

i7-680UM has a 88.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more threads, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 94.4% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core i7-680UM is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T5550
Core 2 Duo T5550
Intel Core i7-680UM
Core i7-680UM

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 59 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T5550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 4 votes

Rate Core i7-680UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core 2 Duo T5550 and Core i7-680UM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.