Atom Z620 vs Celeron M P4600
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3054 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | Intel Atom |
| Power efficiency | 0.62 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Lincroft (2010−2011) |
| Release date | 1 October 2010 (14 years ago) | 4 May 2010 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M P4600 and Atom Z620 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 0.9 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | cDMI |
| Bus rate | 2500 MHz | 400 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 9 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 81+114 mm2 | 65.2526 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 382+177 Million | 140 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M P4600 and Atom Z620 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | PGA988 | Intel BGA 518 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 1.3 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M P4600 and Atom Z620. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Security technologies
Celeron M P4600 and Atom Z620 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M P4600 and Atom Z620 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M P4600 and Atom Z620. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1, DDR2 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 2 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 3.2 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | PowerVR SGX535 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 October 2010 | 4 May 2010 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 1 Watt |
Celeron M P4600 has an age advantage of 4 months, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.
Atom Z620, on the other hand, has 3400% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron M P4600 and Intel Atom Z620. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
