Apple M1 Max vs Celeron M 380
Aggregate performance score
Apple M1 Max outperforms Celeron M 380 by a whopping 8267% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3499 | 635 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Celeron M | Apple M-Series |
| Power efficiency | 0.30 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Apple |
| Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | no data |
| Release date | no data | 18 October 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 380 and M1 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 10 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.06 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 3.22 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 2.9 MB |
| L2 cache | no data | 28 MB |
| L3 cache | 1 MB L2 KB | 48 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 5 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 57000 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| VID voltage range | 1.004V-1.292V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 380 and M1 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PPGA478, H-PBGA479 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 380 and M1 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron M 380 and M1 Max technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 380 and M1 Max are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.15 | 12.55 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 10 |
| Threads | 1 | 10 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 5 nm |
Apple M1 Max has a 8266.7% higher aggregate performance score, 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.
The Apple M1 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron M 380 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
