Athlon X2 QL-67 vs Celeron E3400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3080not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.72no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno data2x AMD Athlon
Power efficiency0.33no data
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Lion (2008−2009)
Release date17 January 2010 (15 years ago)1 September 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$76no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron E3400 and Athlon X2 QL-67 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rateno data4000 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache1 MB (shared)1 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size82 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature74 °C100 °C
Number of transistors228 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E3400 and Athlon X2 QL-67 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775S1g2
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E3400 and Athlon X2 QL-67. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Celeron E3400 and Athlon X2 QL-67 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E3400 and Athlon X2 QL-67 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E3400 and Athlon X2 QL-67. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E3400 and Athlon X2 QL-67.

PCIe version2.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 January 2010 1 September 2009
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron E3400 has an age advantage of 4 months, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon X2 QL-67, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron E3400 and AMD Athlon X2 QL-67. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron E3400 is a desktop processor while Athlon X2 QL-67 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E3400
Celeron E3400
AMD Athlon X2 QL-67
Athlon X2 QL-67

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 303 votes

Rate Celeron E3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Athlon X2 QL-67 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron E3400 and Athlon X2 QL-67, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.