Mobile Pentium III 500 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3100

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2935not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-Coreno data
Power efficiency0.81no data
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Coppermine (1999−2001)
Release date1 September 2009 (16 years ago)25 October 1999 (26 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$530

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and Mobile Pentium III 500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz0.5 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB32 KB
L2 cache1 MB256 KB
Chip lithography45 nm180 nm
Die size107 mm2106 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Million28 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and Mobile Pentium III 500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA479, PGA478495
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt17 Watt

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2009 25 October 1999
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 17 Watt

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 has an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

Mobile Pentium III 500, on the other hand, has 105.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and Intel Mobile Pentium III 500. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3100
Celeron Dual-Core T3100
Intel Mobile Pentium III 500
Mobile Pentium III 500

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 42 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate Mobile Pentium III 500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and Mobile Pentium III 500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.