Atom Z610 vs Celeron B730
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3329 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron | Intel Atom |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Lincroft (2010−2011) |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 (13 years ago) | 4 May 2010 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $70 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron B730 and Atom Z610 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 0.8 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | cDMI |
| Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | 400 MT/s |
| Multiplier | 18 | 8 |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 1.5 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 131 mm2 | 65.2526 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 504 million | 140 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron B730 and Atom Z610 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | G2 (988B) | Intel BGA 518 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 256 KB + 1.5 MB | 1.3 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B730 and Atom Z610. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| FMA | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Security technologies
Celeron B730 and Atom Z610 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B730 and Atom Z610 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B730 and Atom Z610. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | 2 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 1 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | 3.2 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (650 - 1000 MHz) | PowerVR SGX535 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 July 2012 | 4 May 2010 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 256 Watt | 1 Watt |
Celeron B730 has an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.
Atom Z610, on the other hand, has 25500% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron B730 and Intel Atom Z610. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
