Xeon Gold 6240R vs Celeron 877
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Gold 6240R outperforms Celeron 877 by a whopping 4645% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3183 | 339 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 5.17 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Celeron | Intel Xeon Gold |
| Power efficiency | 0.99 | 4.86 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 (13 years ago) | 24 February 2020 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | $2,200 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Celeron 877 and Xeon Gold 6240R basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 14 | 24 |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 1.5 MB |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 24 MB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 35.75 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 131 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | 504 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 877 and Xeon Gold 6240R compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | FCBGA1023 | FCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 165 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 877 and Xeon Gold 6240R. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| My WiFi | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
| FDI | + | no data |
| Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron 877 and Xeon Gold 6240R technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 877 and Xeon Gold 6240R are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 877 and Xeon Gold 6240R. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-2933 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | 1 TB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | 140.8 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processors | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 877 and Xeon Gold 6240R integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
| eDP | + | no data |
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
| SDVO | + | no data |
| CRT | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 877 and Xeon Gold 6240R.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 48 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.40 | 18.98 |
| Recency | 1 July 2012 | 24 February 2020 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 24 |
| Threads | 2 | 48 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 165 Watt |
Celeron 877 has 870.6% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 6240R, on the other hand, has a 4645% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Xeon Gold 6240R is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron 877 in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron 877 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6240R is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
