Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS vs Celeron 6205
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Tiger Lake | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Tiger Lake U (2020) | Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| Release date | 1 September 2020 (5 years ago) | 19 April 2022 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 6205 and Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2/2 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 160 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2.5 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 6 nm |
| Die size | no data | 208 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 6205 and Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA1499 | FP7 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2.5 MB + 4 MB | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 6205 and Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 6205 and Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 6205 and Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 MHz) | AMD Radeon 660M ( - 1900 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 6205 and Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 4.28 | 7.63 |
| Recency | 1 September 2020 | 19 April 2022 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 6 |
| Threads | 2 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2 Watt | 35 Watt |
Celeron 6205 has 1650% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS, on the other hand, has 78.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron 6205 and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
