Opteron 146 HE vs Athlon 64 X2 4000+
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3168 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 0.19 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Windsor (2006−2007) | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) |
| Release date | May 2006 (19 years ago) | February 2004 (21 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Opteron 146 HE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 220 mm2 | 193 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 154 million | 106 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Opteron 146 HE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM2 | 940 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 55 Watt |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 55 Watt |
Athlon 64 X2 4000+ has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
Opteron 146 HE, on the other hand, has 61.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and AMD Opteron 146 HE. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 64 X2 4000+ is a desktop processor while Opteron 146 HE is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
