Core 2 Duo P8700 vs Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
Aggregate performance score
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) outperforms Core 2 Duo P8700 by a whopping 3928% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 285 | 3028 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.02 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple M4 | Intel Core 2 Duo |
| Power efficiency | 22.98 | 0.91 |
| Designer | Apple | Intel |
| Architecture codename | no data | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 1 January 2009 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $209 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
M4 Pro (14 cores) and Core 2 Duo P8700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 14 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.53 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 2.53 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 1066 MHz |
| L2 cache | no data | 3 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 3 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 410 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1V - 1.25V |
Compatibility
Information on M4 Pro (14 cores) and Core 2 Duo P8700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | BGA479,PGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 Pro (14 cores) and Core 2 Duo P8700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
M4 Pro (14 cores) and Core 2 Duo P8700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 Pro (14 cores) and Core 2 Duo P8700 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 20-core GPU | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 21.75 | 0.54 |
| Recency | 30 October 2024 | 1 January 2009 |
| Physical cores | 14 | 2 |
| Threads | 14 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 25 Watt |
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) has a 3927.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, 600% more physical cores and 600% more threads, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.
Core 2 Duo P8700, on the other hand, has 60% lower power consumption.
The Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
